Published on

I Watched Ads on Youtube So You Don't Have To

Introduction

When it comes to advertisements, there’s a fine line between effective marketing and utterly disrespectful tactics. Recently, I stumbled upon a disturbing trend in the world of ads that blurs this line beyond recognition. In one corner, we have examples of classic, delightful ads like Bush Light and Jack Link's—products that simply go well together. On the other, however, are the most disheartening marketing strategies that make companies appear morally bankrupt.

Disrespectful Advertising

One of the most egregious forms of advertisement I have encountered features the use of a deceased actor to promote an unrelated app. This app claims to help individuals disconnect from social media, yet it feels like a mere cover-up to drive sales. Here, a beloved figure's name, image, and likeness are exploited to sell a product with minimal relevance. What’s worse, the clip used in this ad is directly taken from a popular show, Euphoria, without permission.

It’s worth noting that I don’t benefit from critiquing these ads; my intention is purely educational. Modern marketing teams seem increasingly willing to use viral moments or clips from popular culture, thus borrowing credibility from already famous personalities to push their products. These tactics not only feel lazy but also borderline deceitful to viewers, particularly when it appears that the target audience may be as young as 12.

The Chameleon Ads

Following the aforementioned morally questionable ads, I encountered what I term "chameleon ads." In these videos, companies try to concoct relatable, entertaining moments but ultimately fail to disguise the advertisement's essence. For example, one ad features an actress portraying a software engineer, leading to awkward, staged conversations about salary, remote work, and company perks.

Even when these ads attempt to incorporate a casual setting, it feels forced and unnatural. These overly scripted performances often leave viewers feeling uncomfortable and manipulated—especially when a clear indication that it’s sponsored appears at the bottom of the screen. Why disguise a straightforward commercial as something it isn’t? Honesty in advertising would likely foster more respect and engagement from the audience rather than trying to trick them into watching.

Conclusion

As marketers increasingly rely on manipulation and cultural references to sell their products, it’s essential to remain vigilant as consumers. The onus is on companies to communicate their value transparently and respect the trust that viewers place in them.


Keyword

  • Ads
  • YouTube
  • Marketing
  • Disrespectful advertising
  • Dead actors
  • Chameleon ads
  • Social media
  • Exploitation
  • Authenticity

FAQ

Q1: Why are some advertisements considered disrespectful?
A1: Advertisements may be deemed disrespectful if they exploit a deceased individual's name, image, or likeness without the family’s permission or in an irrelevant context.

Q2: What are chameleon ads?
A2: Chameleon ads are misleading advertisements that disguise their intent by presenting scripted, relatable scenarios, making them seem more like organic content than traditional ads.

Q3: How have marketing strategies changed in recent years?
A3: Marketing strategies have increasingly relied on cultural references and viral moments, often appropriating well-known figures or trends to lend credibility to their products.

Q4: Are there any positive examples of ads?
A4: Yes, some advertisements manage to convey their message honestly and effectively, like those that use humor or straightforward communication without attempting to mislead the audience.

Q5: How can consumers react to misleading advertisements?
A5: Consumers can critique misleading ads, share their opinions on social media, and support companies that maintain transparent and respectful marketing practices.